Renal Disease in General Practice

How is renal disease is tested in GP training?

Renal disease is one of the most consistent sources of lost marks in both the AKT and the SCA — not because it’s rare or complex, but because it’s easy to approach in the wrong way.

Trainees often focus on CKD stages, numbers, or new drugs, when exams are really testing something else:
your ability to interpret trends, recognise risk, prioritise management, and explain decisions clearly and proportionately in a GP context.

This resource is designed to help you think about renal disease the way exams expect you to, and the way it presents in real UK general practice — without role-play cases or unnecessary complexity. It is aligned with RCGP renal & urology learning outcomes — including CKD, AKI recognition, cardiovascular risk, and medication safety.

It is relevant for ST1–ST3, and particularly useful if renal questions or consultations consistently feel uncomfortable rather than unfamiliar.

How to use this resource

This pack is structured around five focused learning pillars.

They are designed to work together, but you do not need to complete them in order.
If you already know where your gaps are, you can go straight to the section you need.

You can:

  • work through everything sequentially, or

  • dip into a single pillar for targeted revision.

Five Renal Learning Pillars

1. How renal disease is actually tested (AKT & SCA)
Why trainees lose marks — and what examiners are really looking for.

2. CKD thinking (not stage memorisation)
How to interpret eGFR, trends, and ACR in a GP-relevant way.

3. Medications and renal disease
ACE inhibitors, statins, sick-day rules — and common exam pitfalls.

4. AKI vs CKD and escalation decisions
Recognising deterioration and knowing when community management is unsafe.

5. Exam pitfalls and renal reasoning with vignettes
Short, written scenarios and AKT-style questions to practise judgement (not role-play).

Pillar 1: Renal disease in exams:

Start here.
This short PowerPoint sets the scene for the rest of the renal resource. It explains how renal disease is tested in the AKT and SCA, why it often catches trainees out, and what examiners are really looking for.

It’s designed as a quick mindset reset — you can work through it in a few minutes, then dip into the other pillars depending on where your learning needs are.

Pillar 2: CKD thinking - stop memorising stages

CKD in GP is not about the stage label

In GP exams — and in real practice — chronic kidney disease is rarely assessed by asking what stage it is.
What matters is what that kidney function means for this patient, over time, and what you do about it.

A single eGFR value rarely tells you enough.

Click here to download this quick reference guide to thinking about CKD in clinical practice (and the exams)for future use.

Pillar 3: Medication & Renal Disease

Click on the plus signs to learn more about each heading.

Prefer everything in one place - click here to download the Medication & Renal Disease pdf.

Pillar 4:AKI vs CKD – recognising deterioration &  knowing when to escalate

  • AKI is about change, not numbers

  • Feeling better doesn’t mean kidneys are safe

  • Avoiding escalation because of patient preference is unsafe. (Use your communication skills!)

  • When unsure - escalate

Click here for a downloadable flow chart to put in your doctors office/bag

Pillar 5: Exam pitfalls and renal reasoning

This section brings together the key learning from the renal resources and pillars 1-4. It focuses on how to demonstrate your knowledge and skills of renal disease and it’s management when it is assessed, both in practice and in exams.

As you click through the slides here, you’ll work through a small number of short reasoning vignettes and AKT-style questions, designed to help you practise clinical prioritisation and judgement rather than recall or role-play.

Each explanation highlights common exam pitfalls and signposts you back to the relevant pillar if you want to revisit the underlying thinking. The emphasis throughout is on recognising risk, choosing proportionate management, and explaining decisions clearly — the skills expected of a safe, independent GP.